Care Plans
Pathways your team can actually run
A Care Plan turns a pathway into scheduled tasks, patient-facing steps and a measurement at every stage. Built with the centres that run it. Five indications live.
- Built with the centres that run it
- Writes back through FHIR
- One plan, three views
5 pathways
live with named centres
87%
scheduled steps completed on time
87%
Scheduled steps completed on time, up from 68%
12 months
Measured across four neurology centres
5
Pathways live or in build
2,400
Patients enrolled in a Care Plan
One pathway, three views
For the team, for the patient, for the sponsor.
Tasks with an owner
Every step becomes work with a name and a due point. Nothing lives as a reminder in someone's head.
Steps the patient can see
What happens next, what it is for, what to prepare. The same plan the clinical team is working from.
A measurement at each stage
Completion, time to the next step, missed follow-ups. Recorded as the care happens, not reconstructed afterwards.
It writes back. It does not replace.
The record stays in your system. Hilbi writes structured results through HL7 FHIR R4 and never becomes the record.
What a shortlist asks
In the order an evaluation asks it.
- Price
- Patient-facing steps are in the free core. Team tasks and measurement are priced per tier, from €9 per practice per month.
- Languages
- Slovak, Czech and English.
- Pathways
- Multiple sclerosis first; dementia, colorectal, cardiac ablation and obesity in the launch set.
- Standard
- One versioned Care Plans Standard; ERAS as PlanDefinition with obligation grades.
- Data model
- HL7 FHIR R4 implementation guide. Plan definition and patient-reported data mastered by Hilbi; the clinical record by your system.
- Regulatory position
- Not clinical advice. Sources dated and linked. No outcome claim without methodology. No patient testimonials or photographs.
- Who it is for
- The centres and societies that run the pathway; sponsors co-fund a plan for their indication.
- What it does not do
- It does not author clinical content, does not replace clinical judgement, and is not a system of record.
- Evidence
- Per-pathway outcomes are published below, with the centres, the period and the n for each.
- Exit
- Plan definitions are versioned; patient-reported data exports as a FHIR R4 bundle.
Five pathways, live
Each built with the centres that run it. The measured result is stated per pathway.
- Multiple sclerosis: the first Care Plan, built with the centres that run the pathway.
- Dementia: runs on the same template as multiple sclerosis.
- Colorectal: procedure-anchored.
- Cardiac ablation: procedure-anchored.
- Obesity: metabolic.
| Pathway | Built with | Status | Measured at the centres |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multiple sclerosis | 4 neurology centres, Slovakia | Scheduled steps completed on time rose from 68% to 87% over 12 months | |
| Dementia | 2 centres, Slovakia | Carer tasks completed on time, 79% over 6 months | |
| Colorectal | 3 centres, Slovakia and Czechia | Median time from referral to first appointment fell from 21 to 9 days | |
| Cardiac ablation | 1 centre, Slovakia | Follow-up appointments kept, 92% over 6 months | |
| Obesity | 2 centres, Slovakia | Programme retention at 6 months, 74% |
What clinicians ask
Does a Care Plan replace our system of record?
Who writes the pathway?
What is measured?
What leaves the practice?
Monthly briefing
The signal, once a month.
What changed in European health data, what we shipped, and what it means for a provider. Nothing else.